<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Computer Fraud / Data Protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://computerfraud.us/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://computerfraud.us</link>
	<description>by Nick Akerman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:38:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hacking, Malware, and Social Engineering—Definitions of and Statistics about Cyber Threats Contributing to Breaches by Enterprise Efficiency - Ana Cantu - Dell Tech Weekly</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/articles/hacking-malware-and-social-engineering%e2%80%94definitions-of-and-statistics-about-cyber-threats-contributing-to-breaches/comment-page-1#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Enterprise Efficiency - Ana Cantu - Dell Tech Weekly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=1103#comment-584</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Holding Passwords Hostage – International Extortion Foiled by blinkingyellow1072</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/general/holding-passwords-hostage-%e2%80%93-international-extortion-foiled/comment-page-1#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>blinkingyellow1072</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=1090#comment-583</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of civil route, b/c I think Westrick&#039;s act might arise from some kind of grievances against the company, so the company might be at fault against him first. These days the word &quot;Swiss&quot; is very sensitive, I think there&#039;s a reason why the company does not charge him criminally. Being kind could reward both sides, in the end the matter may be solved amicably. I like the advice in this article very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of civil route, b/c I think Westrick&#8217;s act might arise from some kind of grievances against the company, so the company might be at fault against him first. These days the word &#8220;Swiss&#8221; is very sensitive, I think there&#8217;s a reason why the company does not charge him criminally. Being kind could reward both sides, in the end the matter may be solved amicably. I like the advice in this article very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disgruntled Employee Lacked Criminal Intent to Be Sued for a Civil Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by chiropractors in denver</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/articles/disgruntled-employee-lacked-criminal-intent-to-be-sued-for-a-civil-violation-of-the-computer-fraud-and-abuse-act/comment-page-1#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>chiropractors in denver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=747#comment-581</guid>
		<description>I enjoy reading a post that will make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy reading a post that will make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Prove &#8220;Loss&#8221; for Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by Immigration Lawyers</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/cases/how-to-prove-loss-for-computer-fraud-and-abuse-act/comment-page-1#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Immigration Lawyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=306#comment-580</guid>
		<description>It’s really a cool and helpful piece of info. I’m glad that you shared this useful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s really a cool and helpful piece of info. I’m glad that you shared this useful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nebraska Court: The CFAA Is Not Unconstitutionally Vague by beats kopfhÃ¶rer</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/articles/nebraska-court-the-cfaa-is-not-constitutionally-vague/comment-page-1#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>beats kopfhÃ¶rer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=336#comment-579</guid>
		<description>You should take part in a contest for top-of-the-line blogs on the web. I will advocate this site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should take part in a contest for top-of-the-line blogs on the web. I will advocate this site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Think You Own Your LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook Account?  Think Again. by Courtney Hunt</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/articles/think-you-own-your-linkedin-twitter-and-facebook-account-think-again/comment-page-1#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=1083#comment-578</guid>
		<description>My concern with this case is that people aren&#039;t going to understand (or make the effort to understand) its unique aspects - and how unlikely it is, practically speaking, for the findings in this case to apply elsewhere, especially over the longer term. As a general rule, I don&#039;t think either employers or employees should view individual LinkedIn profiles as the employer&#039;s property. More specifically, no individual should agree to allow their employer to create and/or manage their profile for them - no matter how (self)important they are. I suggest the following guiding principles and guidelines:

1. Individual LI accounts are an employee&#039;s property and responsibility. They are responsible for creating and maintaining their profiles, and they should have the freedom to create and maintain their own networks of contacts throughout their careers.

2. When an individual is employed by a given employer, that employer can provide rules and guidelines about how the individual represents his/her current job and/or how he/she engages with others on LI in the context of that job. The employer cannot dictate any rules with respect to any engagement that does not relate to the job/company (e.g., joining alumni groups, connecting with former classmates and colleagues).

3. Once individuals leave an organization, they should be able - and even expected - to update their employment status without that being considered a violation of a non-compete, non-solicitation agreement. Other activities may be restricted by the former employer based on a prior agreement, but those restrictions should be fair and reasonable to both parties. For example, a former employee shouldn&#039;t be able to solicit business from former clients, but he/she should not be required to sever the LI connection altogether.

For more of my thoughts on the data ownership question, I refer folks to the following post I wrote last summer:

http://www.sminorgs.net/2011/06/social-media-data-ownership-recommendations-for-employers.html

Courtney Shelton Hunt, PhD
Founder, Social Media in Organizations (SMinOrgs) Community</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My concern with this case is that people aren&#8217;t going to understand (or make the effort to understand) its unique aspects &#8211; and how unlikely it is, practically speaking, for the findings in this case to apply elsewhere, especially over the longer term. As a general rule, I don&#8217;t think either employers or employees should view individual LinkedIn profiles as the employer&#8217;s property. More specifically, no individual should agree to allow their employer to create and/or manage their profile for them &#8211; no matter how (self)important they are. I suggest the following guiding principles and guidelines:</p>
<p>1. Individual LI accounts are an employee&#8217;s property and responsibility. They are responsible for creating and maintaining their profiles, and they should have the freedom to create and maintain their own networks of contacts throughout their careers.</p>
<p>2. When an individual is employed by a given employer, that employer can provide rules and guidelines about how the individual represents his/her current job and/or how he/she engages with others on LI in the context of that job. The employer cannot dictate any rules with respect to any engagement that does not relate to the job/company (e.g., joining alumni groups, connecting with former classmates and colleagues).</p>
<p>3. Once individuals leave an organization, they should be able &#8211; and even expected &#8211; to update their employment status without that being considered a violation of a non-compete, non-solicitation agreement. Other activities may be restricted by the former employer based on a prior agreement, but those restrictions should be fair and reasonable to both parties. For example, a former employee shouldn&#8217;t be able to solicit business from former clients, but he/she should not be required to sever the LI connection altogether.</p>
<p>For more of my thoughts on the data ownership question, I refer folks to the following post I wrote last summer:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sminorgs.net/2011/06/social-media-data-ownership-recommendations-for-employers.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.sminorgs.net/2011/06/social-media-data-ownership-recommendations-for-employers.html</a></p>
<p>Courtney Shelton Hunt, PhD<br />
Founder, Social Media in Organizations (SMinOrgs) Community</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on California Court Grants Summary Judgment to Cisco Systems on Computer Fraud and Abuse Claim, Holding that Brekka Does Not Apply to Ex-Employees by Gert</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/recent-updates/california-court-grants-summary-judgment-to-cisco-systems-on-computer-fraud-and-abuse-claim-holding-that-brekka-does-not-apply-to-ex-employees/comment-page-1#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Gert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 02:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=454#comment-570</guid>
		<description>This is both street smart and intellenigt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is both street smart and intellenigt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can You Go to Jail for Lying on Facebook? by Cheyanna</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/articles/can-you-go-to-jail-for-lying-on-facebook/comment-page-1#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheyanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 17:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=1072#comment-560</guid>
		<description>This is an aticrle that makes you think &quot;never thought of that!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an aticrle that makes you think &#8220;never thought of that!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can You Go to Jail for Lying on Facebook? by Rosa</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/articles/can-you-go-to-jail-for-lying-on-facebook/comment-page-1#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 03:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=1072#comment-550</guid>
		<description>I think it is wrong that CFAA can &quot;criminally&quot; charge people for giving false personal information for signing up in Facebook unless the person use that account for criminal activity or cause harm to others.  

First, if I use Facebook only to connect with my friends, those people already know me when they connect with my facebook a/c. Whatever info I gave to Facebook they already know if it&#039;s right or wrong. But I can keep my personal info from the public whom I don&#039;t know but can access my facebook a/c. 

Second, I don&#039;t know to what extent Facebook will keep my personal info. confidential. I cannot trust them the same as I trust my bank or my doctor. I am not sure if Facebook can sell my info to other companies. Besides, who&#039;s going to read the agreement when they sign up on Facebook? I didn&#039;t b/c I assumed it&#039;s a routine thing, a standard agreement like I signed with getting a free PDF reader, or window player something. 

Third, people from different cultures have different customs. I think it&#039;s uncommon for mature women to disclose their age. I put down my dad&#039;s birthday and deathday for my Facebook a/c, not b/c I intended to lie, but b/c I am not sure how long I will keep the account, but now every time I go into my a/c, I naturally remember my dad. So, it becomes something that keeps my dad alive which I really like. 

Four, every time Facebook makes a change and every time I read negative news about them, I would think of cancelling it. So, I don&#039;t feel vulnerable b/c I feel I am in control of what information I want to give them. 

Fifth, it&#039;s a social networking a/c to connect with friends. There&#039;s nothing serious in there. And to be fair I think when people sign up Facebook should display in large, bold, simple words to let people know that giving false information is a criminal offense by law so that people can decide for themselves if they want to open an a/c.

Now I wonder does the same law applies to Youtube account?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is wrong that CFAA can &#8220;criminally&#8221; charge people for giving false personal information for signing up in Facebook unless the person use that account for criminal activity or cause harm to others.  </p>
<p>First, if I use Facebook only to connect with my friends, those people already know me when they connect with my facebook a/c. Whatever info I gave to Facebook they already know if it&#8217;s right or wrong. But I can keep my personal info from the public whom I don&#8217;t know but can access my facebook a/c. </p>
<p>Second, I don&#8217;t know to what extent Facebook will keep my personal info. confidential. I cannot trust them the same as I trust my bank or my doctor. I am not sure if Facebook can sell my info to other companies. Besides, who&#8217;s going to read the agreement when they sign up on Facebook? I didn&#8217;t b/c I assumed it&#8217;s a routine thing, a standard agreement like I signed with getting a free PDF reader, or window player something. </p>
<p>Third, people from different cultures have different customs. I think it&#8217;s uncommon for mature women to disclose their age. I put down my dad&#8217;s birthday and deathday for my Facebook a/c, not b/c I intended to lie, but b/c I am not sure how long I will keep the account, but now every time I go into my a/c, I naturally remember my dad. So, it becomes something that keeps my dad alive which I really like. </p>
<p>Four, every time Facebook makes a change and every time I read negative news about them, I would think of cancelling it. So, I don&#8217;t feel vulnerable b/c I feel I am in control of what information I want to give them. </p>
<p>Fifth, it&#8217;s a social networking a/c to connect with friends. There&#8217;s nothing serious in there. And to be fair I think when people sign up Facebook should display in large, bold, simple words to let people know that giving false information is a criminal offense by law so that people can decide for themselves if they want to open an a/c.</p>
<p>Now I wonder does the same law applies to Youtube account?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 9th Circuit Grants Rehearing En Banc on Nosal by diablo 3</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/recent-updates/9th-circuit-grants-rehearing-en-banc-on-nosal/comment-page-1#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>diablo 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 17:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=1034#comment-536</guid>
		<description>I received excellent data from the weblog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received excellent data from the weblog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suing Employees for Computer Fraud Gets Easier by Family Vacation Ideas</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/articles/suing-employees-for-computer-fraud-gets-easier/comment-page-1#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Family Vacation Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=1042#comment-535</guid>
		<description>Keep working, nice post! This was the information I had to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep working, nice post! This was the information I had to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suing Employees for Computer Fraud Gets Easier by Iphone 5</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/articles/suing-employees-for-computer-fraud-gets-easier/comment-page-1#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Iphone 5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=1042#comment-533</guid>
		<description>he weblog was how do i say it… relevant, finally something that helped me. Many thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he weblog was how do i say it… relevant, finally something that helped me. Many thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suing Employees for Computer Fraud Gets Easier by pleitez</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/articles/suing-employees-for-computer-fraud-gets-easier/comment-page-1#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>pleitez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=1042#comment-531</guid>
		<description>I’m not that much of a internet reader to be honest but your sites really nice, keep it up! I&#039;ll go ahead and bookmark your site to come back later on. Many thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not that much of a internet reader to be honest but your sites really nice, keep it up! I&#8217;ll go ahead and bookmark your site to come back later on. Many thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economic Espionage Act by real estate coaching</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/computer-crime/economic-espionage-act/comment-page-1#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>real estate coaching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 05:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.contact2client.com/?p=208#comment-527</guid>
		<description>Wise Agent has an interface that is easier to use and a little faster to accomplish tasks. It does most of the same things as Top Producer. However, it does not have the ability to mail printed material to a contact automatically on a scheduled delivery. This is one area where Top Producer is very useful. You can set up a campaign once and have it automatically send emails to your contacts, mail printed material, and remind you to call them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wise Agent has an interface that is easier to use and a little faster to accomplish tasks. It does most of the same things as Top Producer. However, it does not have the ability to mail printed material to a contact automatically on a scheduled delivery. This is one area where Top Producer is very useful. You can set up a campaign once and have it automatically send emails to your contacts, mail printed material, and remind you to call them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Practical Steps in Responding to a Data Breach by From the Archives: Which “C” Should Be Concerned About Cyber Security? &#124; The SIEM, Log Management, and Risk Management Blog</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/articles/practical-steps-in-responding-to-a-data-breach/comment-page-1#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>From the Archives: Which “C” Should Be Concerned About Cyber Security? &#124; The SIEM, Log Management, and Risk Management Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=891#comment-526</guid>
		<description>[...] require breaches to be disclosed, all the stakeholders in a company need to be in agreement as to how they will respond when a breach inevitably does [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] require breaches to be disclosed, all the stakeholders in a company need to be in agreement as to how they will respond when a breach inevitably does [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unauthorized Access of President Obama’s Student Loan Data Ends in Computer Fraud Conviction by blinkingyellow</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/articles/unauthorized-access-of-president-obama%e2%80%99s-student-loan-data-ends-in-computer-fraud-conviction/comment-page-1#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>blinkingyellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=1019#comment-521</guid>
		<description>I think the 2-year probation is too much, if she only peeked into the records out of curiosity, plus it will be &quot;on record&quot; for ever, too big a price to pay for curiosity, just if people know what little mistake can cause them big trouble &quot;in law&quot;. But I guess the problem is her false statements. Looks like the court&#039;s stance is much more harsh now compared with the Czubinski case, or is it b/c she does not have a good lawyer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the 2-year probation is too much, if she only peeked into the records out of curiosity, plus it will be &#8220;on record&#8221; for ever, too big a price to pay for curiosity, just if people know what little mistake can cause them big trouble &#8220;in law&#8221;. But I guess the problem is her false statements. Looks like the court&#8217;s stance is much more harsh now compared with the Czubinski case, or is it b/c she does not have a good lawyer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Media Poses Risks To Companies by How Businesses Stay Safe and Secure Using Social Media &#124; Webroot Software</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/data-protection/social-media-risk-to-companies/comment-page-1#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>How Businesses Stay Safe and Secure Using Social Media &#124; Webroot Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 06:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=322#comment-519</guid>
		<description>[...] Social media policies   Hacking Hackers love a challenge and social media is a playground of virtual obstacles. According to a recent article in The Huffington Post, some of the most common Facebook hacks and attacks are: 1. Click-jacking 2. Phishing schemes 3. Fake page scams 4. Rogue applications 5. The Koobface worm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social media policies   Hacking Hackers love a challenge and social media is a playground of virtual obstacles. According to a recent article in The Huffington Post, some of the most common Facebook hacks and attacks are: 1. Click-jacking 2. Phishing schemes 3. Fake page scams 4. Rogue applications 5. The Koobface worm [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Count Dismissed Against Goldman Sachs Computer Programmer Charged with Stealing Source Code by Houston Home Security</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/recent-updates/computer-fraud-and-abuse-act-count-dismissed-against-goldman-sachs-computer-programmer-charged-with-stealing-source-code/comment-page-1#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Houston Home Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 05:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=619#comment-514</guid>
		<description>You have made some decent points there. Used to do a search about them and found most guys will go together with your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have made some decent points there. Used to do a search about them and found most guys will go together with your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Massachusetts Attorney General Enforcement Action: Data Breach, the Massachusetts Privacy Regulation and the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) by Cannon</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/articles/massachusetts-attorney-general-enforcement-action-data-breach-the-massachusetts-privacy-regulation-and-the-payment-card-industry-data-security-standard-pci-dss/comment-page-1#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>Cannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=1011#comment-513</guid>
		<description>awesome blog, do you have twitter or facebook? i will bookmark this page thanks.    
    
My site:   
dsl anbieter und &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dslvergleichdsl.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;dsl vergleich anbieter&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome blog, do you have twitter or facebook? i will bookmark this page thanks.    </p>
<p>My site:<br />
dsl anbieter und <a href="http://www.dslvergleichdsl.com" rel="nofollow">dsl vergleich anbieter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disgruntled Employee Lacked Criminal Intent to Be Sued for a Civil Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by unique clothing</title>
		<link>http://computerfraud.us/articles/disgruntled-employee-lacked-criminal-intent-to-be-sued-for-a-civil-violation-of-the-computer-fraud-and-abuse-act/comment-page-1#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>unique clothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerfraud.us/?p=747#comment-509</guid>
		<description>I have saved your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have saved your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

